![]() ![]() As you know by now, I buy fast lenses to use them wide open, therefore I rarely go smaller than f/2.8. Working with the pre-set aperture could be really tricky for someone who’s always changing the aperture settings while shooting. Taking pictures with this lens on my DSLR took some getting used to but I really love it. Handling of the Helios and some impressions I have to investigate this further, because it sucks. I only realized that when I unpacked my stuff after flying to the UK. My lens doesn’t focus to infinity (at infinity the focal plane is only a few meters away) and the markings are off (90° clockwise, when looking at the front element).(in the image above you see, from top to bottom, the first ring to pre-set the aperture, then, right below that, the second ring that actually moves the aperture blades, and below the DOF-markings you see the focusing ring made of metal with the zebra-markings for improved grip.) In a second step you perform your usual routine, you meter your subject, you compose and focus and, when you are ready to take the shot, you close the aperture with a swift turn of the second ring. the aperture is semi-automatic, which means that you can set your desired aperture with the first ring while not actually closing down the iris yet.The chip helps a lot with using this lens, firstly because the camera beeps when your subject is in focus and more importantly because you always meter the scene wide open and that’s where the second perk/quirk of the lens comes in: Therefore I am using an M42-EOS adapter with AF-confirm chip. my lens comes in M39 screw mount and I got it with an M39-M42 adapter installed.When you look at my Carl Zeiss Jena lenses, that do also feature the “zebra” design, you cannot deny the similarity. The “zebra” design gives another hint at how blatantly the Russians were copying from Zeiss. I got the “zebra” version because I like its look with the white/red markings instead of the typical green ones on other Helios lenses. This image nicely shows the swirly bokeh around the center:Īs you might imagine, this lens is built like a tank and will most likely still be there when everyone else on the planet has perished. In addition, due to this effect getting stronger toward the image borders, the bokeh balls look as if they were circling/swirling around the center. This results in the out of focus highlights (bokeh balls) to not be round at all. Being a blunt copy of the Zeiss Jena Biotar 58mm f/2 it also comes with the same problem that is the so-called “ swirley bokeh” caused by strong vignetting inside the lens barrel. The Helios 44-series is famous for its optical flaws. The Helios 44-series originated in the USSR and the unusual specs (among “standard primes” for cameras using 135 film which usually featured a 50mm focal length with an f/1.4 or f/1.8 aperture.) quickly give away the fact that this lens is a copy of the famous Zeiss Biotar design which also sports 58mm and an f/2 pre-set aperture. (Of course I will try to get an actual Helios 44-2 just to make certain.) Now that this has been settled let’s move on to the lens itself, because I think that it doesn’t really make much of a difference. Mine has the serial number N☇046333 and was assembled in the MMZ factory in Belomo. Therefore, I have one of the last Helios 44(-1) lenses that were produced sometime in 1970. The thing that gives it away as a first generation lens, though, is the fact that it’s an M39 version with adapter ring to M42. Looking at my lens a little closer I had to realize that there is no Helios 44-2 engraved on the front barrel, for it simply says Helios 44. When you scroll down to the Helios 44-2 “zebra”, however, you will find a little note that says “ same barrel as MMZ version of 44(-1)“. Wait, why is the 2 marked in red? *sigh*įirst of, I just realized that I do NOT have the 44-2 version! It was sold on eBay as a Helios 44-2 and I never questioned this, because it looks exactly like the “zebra” on this collection of information about the Helios lenses here. I would like to start with some general information about the Helios 44 -2 “zebra” that I have. I will, of course, share pictures with you, talk about its perks as well as the quirks I found so far and will keep this article updated when something new comes to mind. In this article I would like to talk about my experiences with the Helios 44(-1) 58mm f/2. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |